PTESvsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
See exactly how PTES controls map to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
PTES maps to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) with 32% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 PTES controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Post Exploitation.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.
PTES: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)
PTES: Asset Management(10 mappings)
PTES: Access Control(9 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 720 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other PTES comparisons
Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 720 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between PTES and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
PTES has 53 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Post Exploitation, where 4 PTES controls have no direct Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) equivalent.
How many controls map between PTES and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
Of 53 total PTES controls, 17 map directly to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping PTES to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
36 PTES controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Post Exploitation with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between PTES and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Post Exploitation (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.