Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation ActvsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule
See exactly how Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act controls map to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act maps to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule with 41% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I — General Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects(11 mappings)
Chapter I — General Provisions(9 mappings)
+27 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act comparisons
Other FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act has 44 controls across its framework, while FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I — General Provisions, where 8 Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act controls have no direct FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule equivalent.
How many controls map between Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
Of 44 total Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act controls, 19 map directly to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
28 Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act controls have no direct equivalent in FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I — General Provisions with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I — General Provisions (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.