Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173)vsNebraska Data Privacy Act
See exactly how Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls map to Nebraska Data Privacy Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) maps to Nebraska Data Privacy Act with 43% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Data Processing Principles and Requirements.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.
Regulatory Compliance(3 mappings)
Governance(5 mappings)
Data Subject Rights(3 mappings)
Data Transfers(1 mappings)
Awareness(1 mappings)
Special Categories(1 mappings)
Information Security(2 mappings)
Controller/Processor Obligations and Enforcement(4 mappings)
+11 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 726 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) comparisons
Other Nebraska Data Privacy Act comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 726 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and Nebraska Data Privacy Act?
Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) has 30 controls across its framework, while Nebraska Data Privacy Act covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Data Processing Principles and Requirements, where 4 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls have no direct Nebraska Data Privacy Act equivalent.
How many controls map between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and Nebraska Data Privacy Act?
Of 30 total Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls, 13 map directly to Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) to Nebraska Data Privacy Act?
17 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls have no direct equivalent in Nebraska Data Privacy Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Data Processing Principles and Requirements with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and Nebraska Data Privacy Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is Data Processing Principles and Requirements (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.