Cross-Framework Mapping

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)vsDFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

See exactly how Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls map to DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) maps to DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information with 15% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and Penalties.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Enforcement and Penalties(4 mappings)

CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
CTDPA-1Definitions
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
CTDPA-1Definitions
UKTSA-ENF-05Security Breach Notification
7012(e)(2)Access to Equipment and Information
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers
7012(e)(4)90-Day Data Retention

Chapter I - Preliminary Provisions(3 mappings)

RA10175-S3Definition of Terms3 targets
7012(a)Definitions
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions

Chapter II - Punishable Acts (Section 4)(3 mappings)

RA10175-S4a5Misuse of Devices3 targets
7012(f)(1)Subcontract Flow-Down
7012(f)(2)Subcontractor Incident Reporting
7012(f)(3)Subcontractor Security Compliance

Related Comparisons

Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons

Other DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) and DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) has 41 controls across its framework, while DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and Penalties, where 23 Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls have no direct DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information equivalent.

How many controls map between Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) and DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

Of 41 total Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls, 6 map directly to DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) to DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

35 Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls have no direct equivalent in DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and Penalties with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) and DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and Penalties (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.