TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built EnvironmentsvsCanada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)

See exactly how PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls map to Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments maps to Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) with 29% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(13 mappings)

KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management2 targets
→AIDA-4Risk Identification at Design
→AIDA-5Record Keeping
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline2 targets
→AIDA-16Criminal Provisions
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→AIDA-5Record Keeping
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management3 targets
→AIDA-12Risk Management Policies
→AIDA-4Risk Identification at Design
→AIDA-5Record Keeping
NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls
→AIDA-9Continuous Monitoring
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud3 targets
→AIDA-4Risk Identification at Design
→AIDA-5Record Keeping
→Art. 52Appropriate Safeguards
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
→AIDA-5Record Keeping

Related Comparisons

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA CCM v417 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs ISO 27001:202216 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs MTCS (Singapore)15 mappings

Other Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)7 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)7 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)7 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)7 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)7 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)7 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)6 mappingsNIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile vs Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)?

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments has 24 controls across its framework, while Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 14 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) equivalent.

How many controls map between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)?

Of 24 total PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls, 7 map directly to Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments to Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)?

17 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct equivalent in Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.