Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP MASVSvsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how OWASP MASVS controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
88%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP MASVS maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 88% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OWASP MASVS controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Platform Interaction.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Storage(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-1MASVS-STORAGE: Storage of Sensitive Data
AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud

Cryptography(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-2MASVS-CRYPTO: Cryptography Usage
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Authentication and Authorization(3 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-3MASVS-AUTH: Authentication and Authorization3 targets
AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments

Network Communication(2 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-4MASVS-NETWORK: Network Communication2 targets
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation

Code Quality and Build(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-6MASVS-CODE: Code Quality, Build Settings, and Updates
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management

Resilience and Anti-Tampering(1 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-7MASVS-RESILIENCE: Resilience Against Reverse Engineering
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud

Privacy(2 mappings)

OWASPMASVS-8MASVS-PRIVACY: Privacy and Data Protection2 targets
AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP MASVS and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

OWASP MASVS has 8 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (88% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Platform Interaction, where 1 OWASP MASVS controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP MASVS and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 8 total OWASP MASVS controls, 7 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 88% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP MASVS to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

1 OWASP MASVS controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Platform Interaction with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP MASVS and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Platform Interaction (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.