Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)vsISO/IEC 30111:2019

See exactly how OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls map to ISO/IEC 30111:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) maps to ISO/IEC 30111:2019 with 33% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Metrics and Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Culture and Organization(6 mappings)

DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance6 targets
29147-3Terms and definitions
30111-1Scope
30111-3Terms and definitions
30111-5.1Organizational policy
30111-5.2Vulnerability handling team
30111-8.1Post-release monitoring

Implementation Practices(3 mappings)

DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling3 targets
29147-3Terms and definitions
30111-3Terms and definitions
30111-5.1Organizational policy
Coverage crosswalk

A OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to ISO/IEC 30111:2019 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls your existing OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) into ISO/IEC 30111:2019
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 into OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to ISO/IEC 30111:2019 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 33% in the header counts how many OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and ISO/IEC 30111:2019?

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) has 6 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 30111:2019 covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Metrics and Improvement, where 1 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 30111:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and ISO/IEC 30111:2019?

Of 6 total OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls, representing 33% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to ISO/IEC 30111:2019?

4 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 30111:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Metrics and Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and ISO/IEC 30111:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Metrics and Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.