TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OpenSSF ScorecardvsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how OpenSSF Scorecard controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OpenSSF Scorecard maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OpenSSF Scorecard controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Testing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Repository Governance(1 mappings)

OSSFSC-1Branch Protection, Code Review, and Repository Governance
→AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition

Dependency Management(2 mappings)

OSSFSC-2Dependency Management, Pinning, Updates, Vulnerability Tracking2 targets
→AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
→AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management

Build and CI/CD Security(4 mappings)

OSSFSC-3Build, CI/CD Security, Workflow Permissions, Dangerous Patterns4 targets
→AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
→AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation

Release Integrity and Provenance(1 mappings)

OSSFSC-6Signed Releases, Provenance, Trusted Publishing, Binary Artifacts
→AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Webhooks + Contributors + Score(1 mappings)

OSSFSC-7Webhook Authentication, Contributors Diversity, Aggregate Score
→AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging

Maintenance and Supply Chain Integration(1 mappings)

OSSFSC-8Project Maintenance, Sustainability, Integration with Supply Chain Security
→AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud

Related Comparisons

Other OpenSSF Scorecard comparisons

OpenSSF Scorecard vs OWASP MASVS7 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs OWASP ASVS7 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs ISO/IEC 27011:20247 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs ISO 270437 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs ISO/SAE 214347 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs ISO 270186 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)6 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappings

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27017 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OpenSSF Scorecard and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

OpenSSF Scorecard has 8 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Testing, where 1 OpenSSF Scorecard controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between OpenSSF Scorecard and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 8 total OpenSSF Scorecard controls, 6 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OpenSSF Scorecard to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

2 OpenSSF Scorecard controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Testing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OpenSSF Scorecard and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Testing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.