Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device SecurityvsCyber Security Act 2024 (Australia)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security controls map to Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security maps to Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) with 33% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Mobile Device Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Mobile Device Security Controls(1 mappings)

MD124-CTL-04OS and Application Updates
SCA-S2Interpretation and Definitions

Mobile Device Policies(5 mappings)

MD124-POL-02BYOD Policy
SCA-S2Interpretation and Definitions
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy
SCA-S2Interpretation and Definitions
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management3 targets
CSA24-OBJObjects of the Act
CSA24-RANSOM-CONTENTContent of ransomware payment report
CSA24-SAFE-HARBOURSafe harbour for voluntary information sharing

Mobile Device Security Technologies(3 mappings)

MD124-TECH-03Mobile Application Vetting3 targets
CSA24-RANSOM-CONTENTContent of ransomware payment report
CSA24-RANSOM-PENALTYPenalties for failure to report ransomware payments
CSA24-RANSOM-RPTObligation to report ransomware payments

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security comparisons

Other Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security and Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia)?

NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security has 15 controls across its framework, while Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Mobile Device Security Controls, where 5 NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security controls have no direct Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security and Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia)?

Of 15 total NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security controls, 5 map directly to Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security to Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia)?

10 NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security controls have no direct equivalent in Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Mobile Device Security Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security and Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Mobile Device Security Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.