Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI ProfilevsEAR — Export Administration Regulations

See exactly how NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile controls map to EAR — Export Administration Regulations. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile maps to EAR — Export Administration Regulations with 35% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GAI Risk Categories.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Govern(4 mappings)

AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies2 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
NIST-AI600-GOV-1Legal and Regulatory Compliance2 targets
CA-AODA-CE-03Enforcement
EU-EAA-CE-01Conformity Assessment

Manage(9 mappings)

AIRMF-MAN-01AI Risk Treatment
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
AIRMF-MAN-03AI Incident Response2 targets
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
NIST-AI600-MGT-1Content Provenance Implementation2 targets
EAR-734-02Published and Publicly Available Exclusion
EAR-740-03License Exception ENC (Encryption)
NIST-AI600-MGT-3Third-Party Dependency Management2 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
NIST-AI600-MGT-4Incident Response for GAI2 targets
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting

Map(7 mappings)

AIRMF-MAP-01AI System Context3 targets
EAR-CL-01Item Classification (ECCN)
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
AIRMF-MAP-02AI Risk Identification3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
AIRMF-MAP-03AI Impact Assessment
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile comparisons

Other EAR — Export Administration Regulations comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile and EAR — Export Administration Regulations?

NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile has 43 controls across its framework, while EAR — Export Administration Regulations covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GAI Risk Categories, where 10 NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile controls have no direct EAR — Export Administration Regulations equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile and EAR — Export Administration Regulations?

Of 43 total NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile controls, 15 map directly to EAR — Export Administration Regulations controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile to EAR — Export Administration Regulations?

28 NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile controls have no direct equivalent in EAR — Export Administration Regulations. The highest concentration of gaps is in GAI Risk Categories with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile and EAR — Export Administration Regulations?

The domain with the highest gap count is GAI Risk Categories (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.