TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NERC CIPvsDO-326A / ED-202A

See exactly how NERC CIP controls map to DO-326A / ED-202A. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
85%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NERC CIP maps to DO-326A / ED-202A with 85% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 NERC CIP controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in NERC CIP: Systems Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

NERC CIP: Systems Security(4 mappings)

NERC-CIP-12Malware prevention for operational systems
→DO326A-12Malware prevention for operational systems
NERC-CIP-13Network security monitoring
→DO326A-13Network security monitoring
NERC-CIP-14System security hardening2 targets
→DO326A-14System security hardening
→DO326A-22Configuration management for OT systems

NERC CIP: Incident Response & Recovery(10 mappings)

NERC-CIP-17Recovery plan for critical systems3 targets
→DO326A-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
→DO326A-17Recovery plan for critical systems
→DO326A-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
NERC-CIP-18Reporting obligations to authorities
→DO326A-18Reporting obligations to authorities
NERC-CIP-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies3 targets
→DO326A-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
→DO326A-17Recovery plan for critical systems
→DO326A-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
NERC-CIP-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents3 targets
→DO326A-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
→DO326A-17Recovery plan for critical systems
→DO326A-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

NERC CIP: Supply Chain & Configuration(6 mappings)

NERC-CIP-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
→DO326A-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
NERC-CIP-22Configuration management for OT systems4 targets
→DO326A-14System security hardening
→DO326A-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
→DO326A-22Configuration management for OT systems
→DO326A-23Change management procedures
NERC-CIP-23Change management procedures
→DO326A-21Supply chain risk management for critical components

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NERC CIP comparisons

NERC CIP vs API 116411 mappingsNERC CIP vs IEC 6244311 mappingsNERC CIP vs BIMCO Cyber Security11 mappingsNERC CIP vs IEEE 168611 mappingsNERC CIP vs ISO 2701911 mappingsNERC CIP vs C2M211 mappingsNERC CIP vs NIS2 Directive11 mappingsNERC CIP vs TSA Pipeline Security11 mappings

Other DO-326A / ED-202A comparisons

C2M2 vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappingsAPI 1164 vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappingsIEC 62443 vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappingsISO 27019 vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs DO-326A / ED-202A17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NERC CIP and DO-326A / ED-202A?

NERC CIP has 13 controls across its framework, while DO-326A / ED-202A covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (85% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in NERC CIP: Systems Security, where 1 NERC CIP controls have no direct DO-326A / ED-202A equivalent.

How many controls map between NERC CIP and DO-326A / ED-202A?

Of 13 total NERC CIP controls, 11 map directly to DO-326A / ED-202A controls — representing 85% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NERC CIP to DO-326A / ED-202A?

2 NERC CIP controls have no direct equivalent in DO-326A / ED-202A. The highest concentration of gaps is in NERC CIP: Systems Security with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NERC CIP and DO-326A / ED-202A?

The domain with the highest gap count is NERC CIP: Systems Security (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.