TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management GuidelinesvsCOSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)

See exactly how Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls map to COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines maps to COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) with 12% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cyber Resilience - MAS TRM Chapter 11(1 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Cyber-Resilience-Chapter-11-Threat-Intelligence-Penetration-Testing-Incident-Response-1-Hour-NotificationMAS TRM Cyber Resilience + Chapter 11 + Threat Intelligence + Penetration Testing + Incident Response + 1-Hour Notification
→CA-12Deploys Through Policies and Procedures

Related Comparisons

Other Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines comparisons

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook6 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs APRA CPS 2346 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs IEC 624435 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs API 11645 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappings

Other COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) comparisons

Virginia CDPA vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappingsUruguay DPL vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappingsUK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappingsTexas Data Privacy Act vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappingsTaiwan PDPA vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappingsQatar DPL vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappingsPOPIA vs COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)?

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines has 8 controls across its framework, while COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15, where 1 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) equivalent.

How many controls map between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)?

Of 8 total Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls, 1 map directly to COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines to COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)?

7 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). The highest concentration of gaps is in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.