TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management GuidelinesvsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control Cryptography Network - MAS TRM Chapters 9-10(3 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Access-Cryptography-Network-Security-Chapters-9-10-MFA-PKI-Encryption-Network-SegmentationMAS TRM Access Control + Cryptography + Network + Chapters 9-10 + MFA + PKI + Encryption + Network Segmentation3 targets
→AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
→AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management

Cyber Resilience - MAS TRM Chapter 11(1 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Cyber-Resilience-Chapter-11-Threat-Intelligence-Penetration-Testing-Incident-Response-1-Hour-NotificationMAS TRM Cyber Resilience + Chapter 11 + Threat Intelligence + Penetration Testing + Incident Response + 1-Hour Notification
→AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud

Governance and Framework - MAS TRM Chapters 2-3-5(1 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Governance-Chapters-2-3-Board-Senior-Management-Risk-Framework-Information-Asset-ManagementMAS TRM Governance + Chapters 2-3 + Board + Senior Management + Risk Framework + Information Asset Management
→AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition

Project SDLC and Service Management - MAS TRM Chapters 4-6(1 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Project-SDLC-Service-Management-Chapters-4-5-6-IT-Project-Software-Lifecycle-Change-ITILMAS TRM Project + SDLC + Service Management + Chapters 4-6 + IT Project + Software Lifecycle + ITIL
→AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation

Systems Reliability and Data Centre - MAS TRM Chapters 7-8(1 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Reliability-Data-Centre-Chapters-7-8-RTO-RPO-BCP-DR-System-Availability-4-Hours-12-MonthsMAS TRM Reliability + Data Centre + Chapters 7-8 + RTO + RPO + BCP + DR + System Availability 4 Hours 12 Months
→AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud

Related Comparisons

Other Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines comparisons

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook6 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs APRA CPS 2346 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs IEC 624435 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs API 11645 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems5 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappings

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27017 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines has 8 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15, where 1 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 8 total Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls, 5 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

3 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.