Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy ActvsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices
See exactly how Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls map to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act maps to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Chief Privacy Officer Governance - Minnesota CDPA(1 mappings)
Data Privacy Assessment - Minnesota CDPA(1 mappings)
Universal Opt-Out Sensitive and Health Data - Minnesota CDPA(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?
Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA, where 1 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices equivalent.
How many controls map between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?
Of 8 total Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?
5 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?
The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.