MiFID II / MiFIRvsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework
See exactly how MiFID II / MiFIR controls map to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
MiFID II / MiFIR maps to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework with 7% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 MiFID II / MiFIR controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supervision and Enforcement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
Authorization and Operating Conditions(1 mappings)
Market Structure and Trading Venues(4 mappings)
Investor Protection and Conduct of Business(4 mappings)
Supervision and Enforcement(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other MiFID II / MiFIR comparisons
Other US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between MiFID II / MiFIR and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
MiFID II / MiFIR has 57 controls across its framework, while US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supervision and Enforcement, where 13 MiFID II / MiFIR controls have no direct US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between MiFID II / MiFIR and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
Of 57 total MiFID II / MiFIR controls, 4 map directly to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping MiFID II / MiFIR to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
53 MiFID II / MiFIR controls have no direct equivalent in US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Supervision and Enforcement with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between MiFID II / MiFIR and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is Supervision and Enforcement (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.