Cross-Framework Mapping

MiFID II / MiFIRvsSweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)

See exactly how MiFID II / MiFIR controls map to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MiFID II / MiFIR maps to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) with 16% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 MiFID II / MiFIR controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supervision and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

Authorization and Operating Conditions(1 mappings)

Art. 17Quality Management System
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR

Market Structure and Trading Venues(1 mappings)

Art. 21Cooperation with Competent Authorities
SWE-14Sanctions Framework

Investor Protection and Conduct of Business(8 mappings)

Art. 25Criminal Penalties2 targets
SWE-1Scope and Purpose
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems3 targets
SWE-1Scope and Purpose
SWE-11Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR
Art. 28Notifying Authorities3 targets
SWE-11Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
SWE-12Investigatory Powers
SWE-14Sanctions Framework

Supervision and Enforcement(7 mappings)

Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach3 targets
SWE-1Scope and Purpose
SWE-11Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR
Art.51Exercise of the power to impose administrative penalties and remedial measures
SWE-14Sanctions Framework
Sec. 40Right to Object3 targets
SWE-1Scope and Purpose
SWE-11Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR

Transaction Reporting and Data(3 mappings)

Art. 58Scientific Research Data3 targets
SWE-1Scope and Purpose
SWE-11Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR

Related Comparisons

Other MiFID II / MiFIR comparisons

Other Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between MiFID II / MiFIR and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

MiFID II / MiFIR has 57 controls across its framework, while Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supervision and Enforcement, where 11 MiFID II / MiFIR controls have no direct Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) equivalent.

How many controls map between MiFID II / MiFIR and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

Of 57 total MiFID II / MiFIR controls, 9 map directly to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MiFID II / MiFIR to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

48 MiFID II / MiFIR controls have no direct equivalent in Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218). The highest concentration of gaps is in Supervision and Enforcement with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MiFID II / MiFIR and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supervision and Enforcement (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.