Cross-Framework Mapping

MARS-EvsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how MARS-E controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MARS-E maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 16% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 63 MARS-E controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 63 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

MARS-E: Patient Data Protection(12 mappings)

MARSE-01ePHI access controls and authorization6 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
NIST800-AC-6Least privilege
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
NIST800-AT-3Role-based training
NIST800-PE-2Physical access authorizations
MARSE-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit3 targets
NIST800-IA-7Cryptographic module authentication
NIST800-SC-12Cryptographic key establishment and management
NIST800-SC-13Cryptographic protection
MARSE-05Audit trail for ePHI access3 targets
NIST800-AU-12Audit record generation
NIST800-AU-2Event logging
NIST800-AU-3Content of audit records

MARS-E: Administrative Safeguards(8 mappings)

MARSE-06Security management process and risk analysis3 targets
NIST800-RA-1Policy and procedures for risk assessment
NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
NIST800-RA-5Vulnerability monitoring and scanning
MARSE-07Workforce security and clearance procedures3 targets
NIST800-PS-1Policy and procedures for personnel security
NIST800-PS-3Personnel screening
NIST800-PS-8Personnel sanctions
MARSE-08Information access management2 targets
NIST800-AC-2Account management
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 720 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between MARS-E and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

MARS-E has 63 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control, where 5 MARS-E controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between MARS-E and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 63 total MARS-E controls, 10 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

53 MARS-E controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.