TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MARS-EvsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)

See exactly how MARS-E controls map to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MARS-E maps to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MARS-E controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-Program Coordination - MARS-E v2.0.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control and Identity Authentication - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)

MARS-E-Access-Control-Identity-Authentication-NIST-800-63-Identity-Assurance-Levels-MFA-AC-IA-FamiliesMARS-E Access Control + Identity + Authentication + NIST 800-63 + MFA + AC + IA Families
→AMLCTF-35Identity Verification Standard

Contingency Media Protection System Integrity - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)

MARS-E-Contingency-Media-Protection-System-Integrity-CP-MP-SI-Families-DR-COOP-Encryption-SanitizationMARS-E Contingency + Media Protection + System Integrity + CP + MP + SI Families + DR + COOP
→AMLCTF-35Identity Verification Standard

Security Control Catalog NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)

MARS-E-NIST-800-53-Moderate-Baseline-Catalog-v2-0-Volume-III-Tailoring-Risk-Assessment-CategorizationMARS-E NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline + MARS-E Catalog Volume III + Tailoring + Risk Assessment + Categorization
→AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other MARS-E comparisons

MARS-E vs Turkey KVKK7 mappingsMARS-E vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)7 mappingsMARS-E vs ISO 270187 mappingsMARS-E vs ISO 134857 mappingsMARS-E vs ISO 277997 mappingsMARS-E vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsMARS-E vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar7 mappingsMARS-E vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)7 mappings

Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons

Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)27 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)3 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)3 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)3 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)3 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)3 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)3 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MARS-E and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

MARS-E has 8 controls across its framework, while AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-Program Coordination - MARS-E v2.0, where 1 MARS-E controls have no direct AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between MARS-E and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

Of 8 total MARS-E controls, 3 map directly to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E to AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

5 MARS-E controls have no direct equivalent in AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-Program Coordination - MARS-E v2.0 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E and AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-Program Coordination - MARS-E v2.0 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.