Cross-Framework Mapping

Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)vsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule

See exactly how Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) controls map to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) maps to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule with 48% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 23 Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter Two — Principles and Conditions for Processing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 23 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter Two — Principles and Conditions for Processing(6 mappings)

Art. 10Consent Requirements2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 12Data Ownership2 targets
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
Art. 7Minimum Standards2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications

Chapter Three — Rights of Data Subjects(5 mappings)

Art. 16Data Quality3 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 17Governance Structure2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
FATF-TR-RQ-03Unhosted Wallets

Chapter One — General Provisions(4 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition4 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
FATF-TR-RQ-03Unhosted Wallets
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications

Chapter Four — Security of Data(1 mappings)

Art. 25Criminal Penalties
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25

Chapter Five — Registration of Data Controllers(4 mappings)

Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing4 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) comparisons

Other FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) has 23 controls across its framework, while FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter Two — Principles and Conditions for Processing, where 4 Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) controls have no direct FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule equivalent.

How many controls map between Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

Of 23 total Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) controls, 11 map directly to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

12 Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) controls have no direct equivalent in FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter Two — Principles and Conditions for Processing with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter Two — Principles and Conditions for Processing (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.