Cross-Framework Mapping

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)vsVietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)

See exactly how Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls map to Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) maps to Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) with 27% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Prohibitions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

Prohibitions(6 mappings)

Art.13Prohibition of Data Interference2 targets
Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud4 targets
Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
Art.36Administrative Fines
HUN-2Definitions
HUN-3Fundamental Rules

Obligations of Service Providers(2 mappings)

Art.20Service Provider Duties2 targets
Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)

Procedural Powers(5 mappings)

Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data5 targets
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
Art.36Administrative Fines
HUN-2Definitions
HUN-3Fundamental Rules
URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)

Penalties(1 mappings)

Art.34Penalties for Legal Entities
Art.26Production Orders

Prevention Measures(6 mappings)

LAOS-CC-Art22LaoCERT
Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception
SAPIN2-1Code of Conduct3 targets
Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
Art.2Scope
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
SAPIN2-2Corruption Risk Assessment
Art.25Preservation of Stored Data
SAPIN2-3Third-Party Due Diligence
Art.25Preservation of Stored Data

Related Comparisons

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

Other Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 719 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)?

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) has 33 controls across its framework, while Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Prohibitions, where 5 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) equivalent.

How many controls map between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)?

Of 33 total Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls, 9 map directly to Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) to Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)?

24 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct equivalent in Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14). The highest concentration of gaps is in Prohibitions with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Prohibitions (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.