Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)vsSri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022)
See exactly how Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls map to Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) maps to Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022) with 30% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cyber Offences (Articles 8-18).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.
Prohibitions(7 mappings)
Obligations of Service Providers(3 mappings)
Procedural Powers(7 mappings)
Prevention Measures(3 mappings)
+1 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 719 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons
Other Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 719 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022)?
Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) has 33 controls across its framework, while Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cyber Offences (Articles 8-18), where 5 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022) equivalent.
How many controls map between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022)?
Of 33 total Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls, 10 map directly to Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022) controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) to Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022)?
23 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct equivalent in Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cyber Offences (Articles 8-18) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and Sri Lanka Personal Data Protection Act (No. 9 of 2022)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cyber Offences (Articles 8-18) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.