Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V)vsJordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)
See exactly how Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) controls map to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) maps to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 3 - Collection and Processing of Personal Data.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.
Chapter 3 - Collection and Processing of Personal Data(1 mappings)
Chapter 4 - Rights and Obligations(2 mappings)
Chapter 5 - Liability and Enforcement(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) comparisons
Other Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 716 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?
Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) has 38 controls across its framework, while Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 3 - Collection and Processing of Personal Data, where 5 Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) controls have no direct Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) equivalent.
How many controls map between Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?
Of 38 total Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) controls, 4 map directly to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) to Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?
36 Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) controls have no direct equivalent in Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 3 - Collection and Processing of Personal Data with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Kazakhstan Law on Personal Data and Their Protection (No. 94-V) and Jordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 3 - Collection and Processing of Personal Data (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.