Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 38500:2024vsISO/IEC 17050-2:2004

See exactly how ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls map to ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
55
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 38500:2024 maps to ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 with 11% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 66 ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls identifies 59 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 66 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Good governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024(1 mappings)

iso-iec-38500-2024::4.2Principles, model and framework
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.2Availability

Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024(4 mappings)

iso-iec-38500-2024::5.12Viability and performance over time2 targets
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.1Traceability
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.2Availability
iso-iec-38500-2024::5.6Accountability2 targets
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.1Traceability
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.2Availability

Model for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024(1 mappings)

iso-iec-38500-2024::6.2.2Evaluate
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.2Availability

Framework for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024(5 mappings)

iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2Elements of the framework
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.3Retention period
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2.3Capability2 targets
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.1Traceability
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.2Availability
iso-iec-38500-2024::7.2.7Accountability2 targets
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.1Traceability
iso-iec-17050-2-2004::4.2Availability

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 38500:2024 and ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004?

ISO/IEC 38500:2024 has 66 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 covers 3 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024, where 41 ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 38500:2024 and ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004?

Of 66 total ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 59 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 38500:2024 to ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004?

59 ISO/IEC 38500:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004. The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024 with 41 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 38500:2024 and ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004?

The domain with the highest gap count is Principles for the governance of IT – ISO/IEC 38500:2024 (41 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.