TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 30111:2019vsW3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0

See exactly how ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls map to W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 maps to W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0 with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(2 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions
→W3CVCDM-1Three-Party Ecosystem (Issuer, Holder, Verifier)
30111-3Terms and definitions
→W3CVCDM-1Three-Party Ecosystem (Issuer, Holder, Verifier)

Clause 5: Vulnerability Handling Policy and Organization(1 mappings)

30111-5.1Organizational policy
→W3CVCDM-1Three-Party Ecosystem (Issuer, Holder, Verifier)

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 30111:2019 comparisons

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.08 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20226 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology6 mappings

Other W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0 comparisons

ISO/IEC 29115:2023 - Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappingsISO 13485 vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.02 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0?

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 has 34 controls across its framework, while W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0 covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process, where 5 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0?

Of 34 total ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls, 3 map directly to W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0 controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 30111:2019 to W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0?

36 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.