TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 30111:2019vsISO/IEC 29147:2018

See exactly how ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls map to ISO/IEC 29147:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 maps to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 with 18% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(12 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions2 targets
→29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope
→30111-3Terms and definitions
30111-1Scope4 targets
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-7.8Remediation information
→30111-3Terms and definitions
30111-3Terms and definitions6 targets
→29147-3Terms and definitions
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-7.8Remediation information
→29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope
→30111-1Scope

Clause 5: Vulnerability Handling Policy and Organization(4 mappings)

30111-5.1Organizational policy3 targets
→29147-3Terms and definitions
→29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope
→30111-3Terms and definitions
30111-5.2Vulnerability handling team
→30111-3Terms and definitions

Clause 8: Post-Release Activities(4 mappings)

30111-8.1Post-release monitoring4 targets
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-7.8Remediation information
→30111-3Terms and definitions

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 30111:2019 comparisons

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.08 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20226 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)6 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs SANS Incident Handler's Handbook and PICERL Methodology6 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20188 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 has 34 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 29147:2018 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process, where 5 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 29147:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

Of 34 total ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 30111:2019 to ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

33 ISO/IEC 30111:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 29147:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 30111:2019 and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Vulnerability Handling Process (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.