Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsNotifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) with 25% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(7 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions2 targets
NDB-S26WEDefinition of eligible data breach
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
30111-1Scope
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
30111-3Terms and definitions4 targets
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
NDB-S26WEDefinition of eligible data breach
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts(6 mappings)

29147-5.11Vulnerabilities and risk3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
29147-5.6Vulnerability handling process summary
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
29147-5.8Confidentiality2 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties

Clause 7: Publishing Vulnerability Advisories(1 mappings)

29147-7.8Remediation information
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting

Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(2 mappings)

29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope2 targets
NDB-S26WEDefinition of eligible data breach
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons

Other Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 32 controls across its framework, while Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports, where 7 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

Of 32 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 8 map directly to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

24 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.