Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29134:2023vsSouth Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls map to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

51
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 maps to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 414K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 51 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 414K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(20 mappings)

27014-1Scope5 targets
Art. 17Quality Management System
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art.2Scope
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
27014-3Terms and definitions5 targets
Art. 17Quality Management System
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art.2Scope
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
29134-1Scope10 targets
Art. 12Record-Keeping
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 29Application of a Conformity Assessment Body for Notification
Art. 30Privacy Policy
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
Art. 34-2Personal Information Impact Assessment
Art. 35Right of Access
Art. 40Establishment and Composition
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Art. 71Criminal Penalties for Unlawful Processing

+31 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 715 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 29134:2023 comparisons

Other South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (414K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 has 43 controls across its framework, while South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 4 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

Of 43 total ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls, 5 map directly to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29134:2023 to South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

38 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and South Korea Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.