Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29134:2023vsLloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls map to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 maps to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(4 mappings)

29134-1Scope2 targets
LLOYDS-CI-Risk-Selection-Cyber-Hygiene-Underwriting-Criteria-Pre-Bind-Risk-Engineering-MFA-Backup-EDRLloyds Cyber Insurance Risk Selection + Hygiene + Pre-Bind Engineering
LLOYDS-CI-Systemic-Cyber-Risk-Aggregation-Cyber-Catastrophe-Modelling-Vendor-Use-RDS-Scenario-TestingLloyds Cyber Insurance Systemic Aggregation + Catastrophe Modelling + RDS
29134-3Terms and definitions2 targets
LLOYDS-CI-Risk-Selection-Cyber-Hygiene-Underwriting-Criteria-Pre-Bind-Risk-Engineering-MFA-Backup-EDRLloyds Cyber Insurance Risk Selection + Hygiene + Pre-Bind Engineering
LLOYDS-CI-Systemic-Cyber-Risk-Aggregation-Cyber-Catastrophe-Modelling-Vendor-Use-RDS-Scenario-TestingLloyds Cyber Insurance Systemic Aggregation + Catastrophe Modelling + RDS

Clause 9: PIA Report(2 mappings)

29134-9.1PIA report structure2 targets
LLOYDS-CI-Risk-Selection-Cyber-Hygiene-Underwriting-Criteria-Pre-Bind-Risk-Engineering-MFA-Backup-EDRLloyds Cyber Insurance Risk Selection + Hygiene + Pre-Bind Engineering
LLOYDS-CI-Systemic-Cyber-Risk-Aggregation-Cyber-Catastrophe-Modelling-Vendor-Use-RDS-Scenario-TestingLloyds Cyber Insurance Systemic Aggregation + Catastrophe Modelling + RDS

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 29134:2023 comparisons

Other Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 has 43 controls across its framework, while Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 4 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

Of 43 total ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls, 3 map directly to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29134:2023 to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

40 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.