Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29134:2023vsIEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls map to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 maps to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction and Context(18 mappings)

27014-1Scope6 targets
IEC62304-5.2Software Requirements Analysis
IEC62304-5.2Software Requirements Analysis
IEC62304-5.3Software Architectural Design
IEC62304-5.3Software Architectural Design
IEC62304-7.2Risk Control Measures
IEC62304-7.2Risk Control Measures
27014-3Terms and definitions6 targets
IEC62304-5.2Software Requirements Analysis
IEC62304-5.2Software Requirements Analysis
IEC62304-5.3Software Architectural Design
IEC62304-5.3Software Architectural Design
IEC62304-7.2Risk Control Measures
IEC62304-7.2Risk Control Measures
29134-3Terms and definitions6 targets
IEC62304-5.2Software Requirements Analysis
IEC62304-5.2Software Requirements Analysis
IEC62304-5.3Software Architectural Design
IEC62304-5.3Software Architectural Design
IEC62304-7.2Risk Control Measures
IEC62304-7.2Risk Control Measures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 has 43 controls across its framework, while IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 4 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

Of 43 total ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls, 3 map directly to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29134:2023 to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

40 ISO/IEC 29134:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29134:2023 and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.