Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27004:2016vsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls map to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27004:2016 maps to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Annex Examples.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introductory Clauses(1 mappings)

27004-3Terms and definitions
IATA-IOSA-Section1-ORG-Organization-ManagementSystem-SMSIATA IOSA Section 1 - ORG Organization and Management System + Safety Management System (SMS) + Safety Policy + Hazard ID + Quality

Annex Examples(1 mappings)

27004-A.2Patching and Vulnerability Measures
IATA-IOSA-Section1-ORG-Organization-ManagementSystem-SMSIATA IOSA Section 1 - ORG Organization and Management System + Safety Management System (SMS) + Safety Policy + Hazard ID + Quality

Annex A: Information Security Measurement Model(1 mappings)

27004-A.2Patching and Vulnerability Measures
IATA-IOSA-Section1-ORG-Organization-ManagementSystem-SMSIATA IOSA Section 1 - ORG Organization and Management System + Safety Management System (SMS) + Safety Policy + Hazard ID + Quality

Annex B: Example Measurements(1 mappings)

27004-B.1Example measurement definitions
IATA-IOSA-Section1-ORG-Organization-ManagementSystem-SMSIATA IOSA Section 1 - ORG Organization and Management System + Safety Management System (SMS) + Safety Policy + Hazard ID + Quality

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

ISO/IEC 27004:2016 has 30 controls across its framework, while IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual covers 9 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex Examples, where 5 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls have no direct IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

Of 30 total ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls, 4 map directly to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27004:2016 to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

41 ISO/IEC 27004:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex Examples with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27004:2016 and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

The domain with the highest gap count is Annex Examples (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.