ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) with 14% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 80 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 69 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leadership (Clause 5).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 80 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.
Operation (Clause 8)(13 mappings)
Leadership (Clause 5)(1 mappings)
Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(3 mappings)
Planning (Clause 6)(3 mappings)
+2 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 701 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons
Other Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 701 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016)?
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 80 controls across its framework, while Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leadership (Clause 5), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016)?
Of 80 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 11 map directly to Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 69 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016)?
69 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016). The highest concentration of gaps is in Leadership (Clause 5) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Leadership (Clause 5) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.