Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
66
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices with 6% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 68 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support (Clause 7).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(4 mappings)

ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS3 targets
MD124-CTL-04OS and Application Updates
MD124-POL-02BYOD Policy
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 72 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support (Clause 7), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

Of 72 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 68 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

68 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support (Clause 7) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support (Clause 7) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.