Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
64
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) with 8% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 66 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support (Clause 7).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(4 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
Sapin2-Pillar1-Code-of-ConductPillar 1 - Anti-Corruption Code of Conduct

Planning (Clause 6)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities2 targets
Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 72 controls across its framework, while French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support (Clause 7), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

Of 72 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 6 map directly to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 66 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

66 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691). The highest concentration of gaps is in Support (Clause 7) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support (Clause 7) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.