ISO 45001vsJapan AI Guidelines
See exactly how ISO 45001 controls map to Japan AI Guidelines. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 45001 maps to Japan AI Guidelines with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 ISO 45001 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 45001: Performance & Improvement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ISO 45001: OH&S Policy & Planning(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 45001 comparisons
Other Japan AI Guidelines comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 45001 and Japan AI Guidelines?
ISO 45001 has 39 controls across its framework, while Japan AI Guidelines covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 45001: Performance & Improvement, where 5 ISO 45001 controls have no direct Japan AI Guidelines equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 45001 and Japan AI Guidelines?
Of 39 total ISO 45001 controls, 2 map directly to Japan AI Guidelines controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 45001 to Japan AI Guidelines?
37 ISO 45001 controls have no direct equivalent in Japan AI Guidelines. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 45001: Performance & Improvement with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 45001 and Japan AI Guidelines?
The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 45001: Performance & Improvement (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.