Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27799vsUK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)

See exactly how ISO 27799 controls map to UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27799 maps to UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) with 9% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27799 controls identifies 42 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

ISO 27799: Patient Data Protection(6 mappings)

ISO27799-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement2 targets
Standard 15Online Tools
Standard 2Data Protection Impact Assessments
ISO27799-04Patient data de-identification procedures2 targets
Standard 15Online Tools
Standard 2Data Protection Impact Assessments
ISO27799-05Audit trail for ePHI access2 targets
Standard 15Online Tools
Standard 2Data Protection Impact Assessments

ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO27799-06Security management process and risk analysis
Standard 2Data Protection Impact Assessments
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO 27799 to UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls your existing ISO 27799 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 27799 into UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) into ISO 27799
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 27799 to UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 9% in the header counts how many ISO 27799 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27799 and UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)?

ISO 27799 has 46 controls across its framework, while UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards, where 5 ISO 27799 controls have no direct UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27799 and UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)?

Of 46 total ISO 27799 controls, 4 map directly to UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls, representing 9% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27799 to UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)?

42 ISO 27799 controls have no direct equivalent in UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code). The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27799 and UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.