Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27799vsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices

See exactly how ISO 27799 controls map to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27799 maps to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices with 13% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27799 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 27799: Patient Data Protection(6 mappings)

ISO27799-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit3 targets
MD124-CTL-02Device Encryption
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy
MD124-TECH-05VPN and Secure Communication
ISO27799-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy
ISO27799-04Patient data de-identification procedures
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy
ISO27799-05Audit trail for ePHI access
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy

ISO 27799: Technical Safeguards(4 mappings)

ISO27799-12Unique user identification and authentication
MD124-CTL-01Device Authentication and Lock
ISO27799-16Transmission security and encryption3 targets
MD124-CTL-02Device Encryption
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy
MD124-TECH-05VPN and Secure Communication

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27799 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

ISO 27799 has 46 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards, where 6 ISO 27799 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27799 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

Of 46 total ISO 27799 controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27799 to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

40 ISO 27799 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27799 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 27799: Administrative Safeguards (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.