Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27019vsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices

See exactly how ISO 27019 controls map to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27019 maps to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices with 17% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27019 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 27019: Systems Security(3 mappings)

ISO27019-12Malware prevention for operational systems
MD124-TECH-03Mobile Application Vetting
ISO27019-13Network security monitoring2 targets
MD124-CTL-06Network Security for Mobile
MD124-TECH-05VPN and Secure Communication

ISO 27019: Incident Response & Recovery(3 mappings)

ISO27019-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
ISO27019-18Reporting obligations to authorities
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
ISO27019-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management

ISO 27019: Supply Chain & Configuration(3 mappings)

ISO27019-22Configuration management for OT systems
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
ISO27019-23Change management procedures
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
ISO27019-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27019 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

ISO 27019 has 46 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations, where 5 ISO 27019 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27019 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

Of 46 total ISO 27019 controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27019 to NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

38 ISO 27019 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27019 and NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.