TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27019vsKentucky Consumer Data Protection Act

See exactly how ISO 27019 controls map to Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27019 maps to Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act with 15% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27019 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

ISO 27019: Access Management(4 mappings)

ISO27019-07Personnel risk assessment2 targets
→KY-CDPA-Attorney-General-AG-Enforcement-Sole-30-Day-Cure-Period-7500-Civil-Penalty-Per-ViolationKentucky CDPA Attorney General Enforcement + Sole Authority + 30-Day Cure Period + USD 7,500 Civil Penalty Per Violation + No Private Right of Action + Injunctive Relief + Attorneys' Fees + Section 9 Enforcement + Children's Data + Sensitive Data Heightened
→KY-CDPA-Data-Protection-Assessment-DPA-Targeted-Advertising-Sale-Sensitive-Profiling-Substantial-RiskKentucky CDPA Data Protection Assessment (DPA) + Section 6 + Targeted Advertising + Sale + Sensitive Data + Profiling Substantial Injury + Maintained Records + Attorney General Access + 4 Categories Requiring DPA + Risk-Benefit Analysis
ISO27019-08Electronic access perimeter management
→KY-CDPA-Attorney-General-AG-Enforcement-Sole-30-Day-Cure-Period-7500-Civil-Penalty-Per-ViolationKentucky CDPA Attorney General Enforcement + Sole Authority + 30-Day Cure Period + USD 7,500 Civil Penalty Per Violation + No Private Right of Action + Injunctive Relief + Attorneys' Fees + Section 9 Enforcement + Children's Data + Sensitive Data Heightened
ISO27019-10Revocation of access procedures
→KY-CDPA-Attorney-General-AG-Enforcement-Sole-30-Day-Cure-Period-7500-Civil-Penalty-Per-ViolationKentucky CDPA Attorney General Enforcement + Sole Authority + 30-Day Cure Period + USD 7,500 Civil Penalty Per Violation + No Private Right of Action + Injunctive Relief + Attorneys' Fees + Section 9 Enforcement + Children's Data + Sensitive Data Heightened

ISO 27019: Incident Response & Recovery(6 mappings)

ISO27019-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions2 targets
→KY-CDPA-Attorney-General-AG-Enforcement-Sole-30-Day-Cure-Period-7500-Civil-Penalty-Per-ViolationKentucky CDPA Attorney General Enforcement + Sole Authority + 30-Day Cure Period + USD 7,500 Civil Penalty Per Violation + No Private Right of Action + Injunctive Relief + Attorneys' Fees + Section 9 Enforcement + Children's Data + Sensitive Data Heightened
→KY-CDPA-Sensitive-Data-Affirmative-Consent-Race-Religious-Health-Genetic-Biometric-Children-CitizenshipKentucky CDPA Sensitive Data + Affirmative Consent + Race/Ethnicity + Religious + Mental/Physical Health + Sexual Orientation + Citizenship/Immigration + Genetic + Biometric + Children's Data + Precise Geolocation (1,750 ft) + Section 4 Heightened Consent Standard
ISO27019-18Reporting obligations to authorities2 targets
→KY-CDPA-Attorney-General-AG-Enforcement-Sole-30-Day-Cure-Period-7500-Civil-Penalty-Per-ViolationKentucky CDPA Attorney General Enforcement + Sole Authority + 30-Day Cure Period + USD 7,500 Civil Penalty Per Violation + No Private Right of Action + Injunctive Relief + Attorneys' Fees + Section 9 Enforcement + Children's Data + Sensitive Data Heightened
→KY-CDPA-Sensitive-Data-Affirmative-Consent-Race-Religious-Health-Genetic-Biometric-Children-CitizenshipKentucky CDPA Sensitive Data + Affirmative Consent + Race/Ethnicity + Religious + Mental/Physical Health + Sexual Orientation + Citizenship/Immigration + Genetic + Biometric + Children's Data + Precise Geolocation (1,750 ft) + Section 4 Heightened Consent Standard
ISO27019-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents2 targets
→KY-CDPA-Attorney-General-AG-Enforcement-Sole-30-Day-Cure-Period-7500-Civil-Penalty-Per-ViolationKentucky CDPA Attorney General Enforcement + Sole Authority + 30-Day Cure Period + USD 7,500 Civil Penalty Per Violation + No Private Right of Action + Injunctive Relief + Attorneys' Fees + Section 9 Enforcement + Children's Data + Sensitive Data Heightened
→KY-CDPA-Sensitive-Data-Affirmative-Consent-Race-Religious-Health-Genetic-Biometric-Children-CitizenshipKentucky CDPA Sensitive Data + Affirmative Consent + Race/Ethnicity + Religious + Mental/Physical Health + Sexual Orientation + Citizenship/Immigration + Genetic + Biometric + Children's Data + Precise Geolocation (1,750 ft) + Section 4 Heightened Consent Standard

ISO 27019: Supply Chain & Configuration(1 mappings)

ISO27019-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
→KY-CDPA-Data-Protection-Assessment-DPA-Targeted-Advertising-Sale-Sensitive-Profiling-Substantial-RiskKentucky CDPA Data Protection Assessment (DPA) + Section 6 + Targeted Advertising + Sale + Sensitive Data + Profiling Substantial Injury + Maintained Records + Attorney General Access + 4 Categories Requiring DPA + Risk-Benefit Analysis

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27019 comparisons

ISO 27019 vs API 116416 mappingsISO 27019 vs NIS2 Directive16 mappingsISO 27019 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security15 mappingsISO 27019 vs ISO 27001:202213 mappingsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 mappingsISO 27019 vs ISO/IEC 27010:201512 mappings

Other Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act comparisons

Turkey KVKK vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsAPPI vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsVietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27019 and Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act?

ISO 27019 has 46 controls across its framework, while Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations, where 5 ISO 27019 controls have no direct Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27019 and Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act?

Of 46 total ISO 27019 controls, 7 map directly to Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27019 to Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act?

39 ISO 27019 controls have no direct equivalent in Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27019 and Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.