TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27017vsISO/IEC 29147:2018

See exactly how ISO 27017 controls map to ISO/IEC 29147:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27017 maps to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 27017 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud-specific.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 357K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 357K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

ISO 27017: Cloud Governance(5 mappings)

ISO27017-01Shared responsibility model definition3 targets
→29147-3Terms and definitions
→29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope
→30111-3Terms and definitions
ISO27017-03Cloud risk assessment2 targets
→29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
→29147-5.11Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture

ISO 27017: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(6 mappings)

ISO27017-22Incident response in cloud
→30111-3Terms and definitions
ISO27017-23Cloud vulnerability management5 targets
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-7.8Remediation information
→30111-1Scope
→30111-3Terms and definitions

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27017 comparisons

ISO 27017 vs ISMAP (Japan)21 mappingsISO 27017 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar21 mappingsISO 27017 vs Azure Security Benchmark21 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-14621 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-19021 mappingsISO 27017 vs ISO 2701821 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-14421 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-14521 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20188 mappingsNIST AI 600-1: Generative AI Profile vs ISO/IEC 29147:20188 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsISO/IEC 29134:2023 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 704 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (357K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27017 and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

ISO 27017 has 37 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 29147:2018 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud-specific, where 7 ISO 27017 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 29147:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27017 and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

Of 37 total ISO 27017 controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27017 to ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

33 ISO 27017 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 29147:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud-specific with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27017 and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud-specific (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.