Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
98
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges with 7% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 110 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(4 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
ISO27001-A.5.34Personal data and privacy safeguards
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline

A.8 Technological Controls(3 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.15Audit trail and event logging
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
ISO27001-A.8.5Secure Authentication
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification

Annex A Theme 4(1 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.5Secure Authentication
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

ISO 27001:2022 has 106 controls across its framework, while MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges covers 3 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 35 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

Of 106 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 8 map directly to MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 110 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

110 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 35 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (35 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.