Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsIEEE 1686

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to IEEE 1686. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

36
Controls Mapped
70
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to IEEE 1686 with 13% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 102 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 445K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 36 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 445K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(20 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.12Data sensitivity classification scheme
IEEE1686-02System security categorization
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance3 targets
IEEE1686-07Personnel risk assessment
IEEE1686-08Electronic access perimeter management
IEEE1686-09Interactive remote access security
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management3 targets
IEEE1686-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
IEEE1686-23Change management procedures
IEEE1686-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts3 targets
IEEE1686-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
IEEE1686-23Change management procedures
IEEE1686-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring3 targets
IEEE1686-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
IEEE1686-23Change management procedures
IEEE1686-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness3 targets
IEEE1686-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
IEEE1686-18Reporting obligations to authorities
IEEE1686-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation3 targets
IEEE1686-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
IEEE1686-18Reporting obligations to authorities
IEEE1686-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
IEEE1686-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions

+16 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 725 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 725 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (445K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and IEEE 1686?

ISO 27001:2022 has 106 controls across its framework, while IEEE 1686 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 30 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct IEEE 1686 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and IEEE 1686?

Of 106 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 16 map directly to IEEE 1686 controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 102 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to IEEE 1686?

102 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in IEEE 1686. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and IEEE 1686?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.