Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22318vsNFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management

See exactly how ISO 22318 controls map to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22318 maps to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management with 14% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 ISO 22318 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 22318: Business Impact Analysis(2 mappings)

ISO22318-08Recovery time and point objectives2 targets
NFPA1600-5.3Resource Needs Assessment
NFPA1600-6.4Continuity and Recovery

ISO 22318: Business Continuity Strategy(11 mappings)

ISO22318-12Recovery strategy for critical activities2 targets
NFPA1600-5.3Resource Needs Assessment
NFPA1600-6.4Continuity and Recovery
ISO22318-13Alternate site and resource planning3 targets
NFPA1600-4.1Leadership and Commitment
NFPA1600-6.2Crisis Management and Communications
NFPA1600-6.4Continuity and Recovery
ISO22318-14Supply chain continuity3 targets
NFPA1600-4.1Leadership and Commitment
NFPA1600-6.2Crisis Management and Communications
NFPA1600-6.4Continuity and Recovery
ISO22318-15Communication strategy during disruption3 targets
NFPA1600-4.1Leadership and Commitment
NFPA1600-6.2Crisis Management and Communications
NFPA1600-6.4Continuity and Recovery

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22318 comparisons

Other NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22318 and NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

ISO 22318 has 36 controls across its framework, while NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising, where 5 ISO 22318 controls have no direct NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22318 and NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

Of 36 total ISO 22318 controls, 5 map directly to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22318 to NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

31 ISO 22318 controls have no direct equivalent in NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22318 and NFPA 1600 - Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 22318: BCM Testing & Exercising (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.