ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management SystemsvsNABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System
See exactly how ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls map to NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems maps to NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System with 2% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 167 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls identifies 164 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 167 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 4: Context of the Organization(2 mappings)
Clause 5: Leadership(2 mappings)
Clause 7: Support(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems comparisons
Other NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System?
ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems has 167 controls across its framework, while NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 33 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System?
Of 167 total ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls, 3 map directly to NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 164 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems to NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System?
164 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct equivalent in NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and NABERS - National Australian Built Environment Rating System?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.