ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management SystemsvsLloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards
See exactly how ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls map to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems maps to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards with 1% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 167 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls identifies 166 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Support.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 167 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.
Clause 8: Operation(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems comparisons
Other Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 706 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?
ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems has 167 controls across its framework, while Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (1% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Support, where 34 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?
Of 167 total ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls, 1 map directly to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards controls — representing 1% coverage. The remaining 166 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems to Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?
166 ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems controls have no direct equivalent in Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Support with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22313:2020 - Guidance on Business Continuity Management Systems and Lloyd's of London Cyber Insurance Requirements and Underwriting Standards?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Support (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.