ISO 22301:2019vsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework
See exactly how ISO 22301:2019 controls map to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 22301:2019 maps to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO 22301:2019 controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22301:2019.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Planning – ISO 22301:2019(1 mappings)
Operation – ISO 22301:2019(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Other US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 22301:2019 and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
ISO 22301:2019 has 44 controls across its framework, while US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework covers 5 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22301:2019, where 18 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 22301:2019 and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
Of 44 total ISO 22301:2019 controls, 2 map directly to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22301:2019 to US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
42 ISO 22301:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22301:2019 with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22301:2019 and US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22301:2019 (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.