TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20000-1vsNotifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)

See exactly how ISO 20000-1 controls map to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
49
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20000-1 maps to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) with 4% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 51 ISO 20000-1 controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 20000-1: Service Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 51 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 353K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 353K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Planning(1 mappings)

6.3Information security awareness, education and training
→NDB-S26WEDefinition of eligible data breach

Performance Evaluation(1 mappings)

9.2Internal Audit
→NDB-S26WEDefinition of eligible data breach

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20000-1 comparisons

ISO 20000-1 vs SWIFT CSCF10 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes8 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ISO 190118 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence7 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System7 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20177 mappings

Other Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) comparisons

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)2 mappingsMontana Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)1 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)1 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)1 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)1 mappingsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)1 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)1 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 704 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (353K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 20000-1 and Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

ISO 20000-1 has 51 controls across its framework, while Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 20000-1: Service Operation, where 5 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20000-1 and Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

Of 51 total ISO 20000-1 controls, 2 map directly to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20000-1 to Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

49 ISO 20000-1 controls have no direct equivalent in Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 20000-1: Service Operation with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20000-1 and Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 20000-1: Service Operation (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.