TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 19011vsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how ISO 19011 controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 19011 maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 14% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ISO 19011 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Audit Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

Audit Process(7 mappings)

6.3Information security awareness, education and training
→AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
6.4Logging and Monitoring
→AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report2 targets
→AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
→AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up2 targets
→AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

ISO 19011: Improvement(1 mappings)

ISO19011-18Innovation and change management
→AWS-WA-24Cloud change management

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 19011 comparisons

ISO 19011 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsISO 19011 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange7 mappingsISO 19011 vs SWIFT CSCF6 mappingsISO 19011 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence6 mappingsISO 19011 vs ISO 20000-16 mappingsISO 19011 vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappingsISO 19011 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO 19011 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments6 mappings

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27017 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27018 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 730 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 19011 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

ISO 19011 has 42 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Audit Principles, where 7 ISO 19011 controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 19011 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 42 total ISO 19011 controls, 6 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 19011 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

36 ISO 19011 controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Audit Principles with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 19011 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Audit Principles (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.