TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 19011:2018vsISO 27002:2022

See exactly how ISO 19011:2018 controls map to ISO 27002:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 19011:2018 maps to ISO 27002:2022 with 29% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 55 ISO 19011:2018 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 55 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Managing an audit programme – ISO 19011:2018(5 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::5.4.1Roles and responsibilities of the individual(s) managing the audit programme
→iso-27002-2022::8.18Use of privileged utility programs
iso-19011-2018::5.5.3Selecting and determining audit methods
→iso-27002-2022::5.3Segregation of duties
iso-19011-2018::5.5.4Selecting audit team members2 targets
→iso-27002-2022::5.3Segregation of duties
→iso-27002-2022::8.15Logging
iso-19011-2018::5.6Monitoring audit programme
→iso-27002-2022::8.16Monitoring activities

Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018(13 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::6.2.3Determining feasibility of audit
→iso-27002-2022::0.4Determining controls
iso-19011-2018::6.3Preparing audit activities2 targets
→iso-27002-2022::7.11Supporting utilities
→iso-27002-2022::8.16Monitoring activities
iso-19011-2018::6.3.1Performing review of documented information
→iso-27002-2022::8.33Test information
iso-19011-2018::6.4Conducting audit activities3 targets
→iso-27002-2022::5.5Contact with authorities
→iso-27002-2022::7.11Supporting utilities
→iso-27002-2022::8.16Monitoring activities
iso-19011-2018::6.4.3Conducting opening meeting
→iso-27002-2022::8.15Logging
iso-19011-2018::6.4.5Audit information availability and access2 targets
→iso-27002-2022::5.26Response to information security incidents
→iso-27002-2022::5.35Independent review of information security
iso-19011-2018::6.4.7Collecting and verifying information
→iso-27002-2022::5.13Labelling of information
iso-19011-2018::6.4.9Determining audit conclusions
→iso-27002-2022::0.4Determining controls
iso-19011-2018::6.7Conducting audit follow-up
→iso-27002-2022::8.15Logging

Competence and evaluation of auditors – ISO 19011:2018(2 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::7.2Determining auditor competence
→iso-27002-2022::0.4Determining controls
iso-19011-2018::7.2.3Knowledge and skills
→iso-27002-2022::8.15Logging

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 19011:2018 comparisons

ISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 14001:201546 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 14004:201643 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 31000:201842 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 45001:201839 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27701:201933 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 37301:202133 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 13485:201633 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 22000:201831 mappings

Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons

ISO 27018:2019 vs ISO 27002:202229 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ISO 27002:202219 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs ISO 27002:202217 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 27002:20228 mappingsISO 27017:2015 vs ISO 27002:20227 mappingsISO/IEC 29100:2024 vs ISO 27002:20227 mappingsISO/IEC 38500:2024 vs ISO 27002:20227 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs ISO 27002:20227 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27002:2022?

ISO 19011:2018 has 55 controls across its framework, while ISO 27002:2022 covers 94 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018, where 17 ISO 19011:2018 controls have no direct ISO 27002:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27002:2022?

Of 55 total ISO 19011:2018 controls, 16 map directly to ISO 27002:2022 controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 19011:2018 to ISO 27002:2022?

39 ISO 19011:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27002:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018 with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27002:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018 (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.