Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3)vsEU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)

See exactly how ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) controls map to EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) maps to EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) with 18% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: Project-Level GHG Quantification.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part 1: Organizational GHG Inventory — Principles and Requirements(4 mappings)

ISO-14064-1-5.1Organizational boundaries4 targets
Art. 17Governance Structure
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 8Data Categories

Part 3: Verification and Validation of GHG Assertions(9 mappings)

ISO-14064-3-5Selecting the validator/verifier3 targets
EUTAX-OBJ-01Climate Change Mitigation
EUTAX-OBJ-02Climate Change Adaptation
EUTAX-OBJ-5Pollution Prevention and Control
ISO-14064-3-8Assessing GHG data and information3 targets
EUTAX-OBJ-01Climate Change Mitigation
EUTAX-OBJ-02Climate Change Adaptation
EUTAX-OBJ-5Pollution Prevention and Control
ISO-14064-3-9Evaluating GHG assertions3 targets
EUTAX-OBJ-01Climate Change Mitigation
EUTAX-OBJ-02Climate Change Adaptation
EUTAX-OBJ-5Pollution Prevention and Control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) comparisons

Other EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) and EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)?

ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) has 22 controls across its framework, while EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: Project-Level GHG Quantification, where 6 ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) controls have no direct EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) and EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)?

Of 22 total ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) controls, 4 map directly to EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) to EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)?

18 ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) controls have no direct equivalent in EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: Project-Level GHG Quantification with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 14064 — Greenhouse Gas Accounting and Verification (Parts 1-3) and EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation 2020/852)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: Project-Level GHG Quantification (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.