IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)vsSolvency II
See exactly how IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls map to Solvency II. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) maps to Solvency II with 27% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Strategic Risk.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Financial Risk(2 mappings)
Operational Risk(3 mappings)
Risk Management Process(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons
Other Solvency II comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and Solvency II?
IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) has 15 controls across its framework, while Solvency II covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Strategic Risk, where 3 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct Solvency II equivalent.
How many controls map between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and Solvency II?
Of 15 total IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls, 4 map directly to Solvency II controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) to Solvency II?
11 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct equivalent in Solvency II. The highest concentration of gaps is in Strategic Risk with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and Solvency II?
The domain with the highest gap count is Strategic Risk (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.